Page Rank and Link Rank

Do you own a website? Would you like to know how much it cost for an advertiser to place a link on your website. First of all you need to understand what page rank and link rank are. Usually page rank and link rank are measured from a score of 1 to 10.

In order to have a high page rank you need to have many quality links pointing to your website. It is a good idea to have many links pointing to your website but in order to get a good page rank you need quality links. Google doesn’t shows backward links from pages having PR value lesser than 3. Google has recently stopped displaying all backward links it knows. Webmasters have two general opinions upon those links, which are now displayed as backward links: 1. Google randomly shows backward links. 2. Google shows that backward links, which are considered relevant for this page (relevant means that a page, which contains a link to your site is somehow related to yours in subject (content)).
Read more…

PageRank Explained

Appraisal of link importance.
Term “Link Popularity” is a bit incorrect. It would be much more close to what it means if it would be called “Link Topology”, because this method considers relationship of links along with quantity. However, as a result of analysis we receive “importance” of a page. This is not what “relevancy” is. Relevancy shows how contents of your page correspond to a particular search query. “Importance” shows value of page, regardless of it’s contents. Any inbound link states that this page has some value and it increases it’s “importance” this way. The more rating it has, the more “important” it is.
Not all links are making equal contribution in page’s rating. Some of linking pages can be more important than others and so on, thus outbound link from such page is more important.
So, “Important page is a page that has links from important pages. Exclusive circle? Yes, it’s rather easy to understand subconsciously. For instance a link from NASA will be more important than a link from your cousin’s Kate homepage – not because NASA loves you more, but because there are thousands of sites linking to NASA and just a couple of them linking to Kate’s.
How the “importance” is measured.
Though it is easy to understand on instance of relationship between two pages, measuring of importance of milliards of related pages seems hopelessly complicated. Indeed this is really complicated, but not hopelessly – everything’s almost easy. Such measures demand lots calculations, but fortunately we shan’t invent anything new. We can just take ready formulae from scientific sources.
Larry Page and Sergey Brin, the founders of Google and first developers of it’s algorithm have published “The Anatomy of Large Hypertext Search Engine”. You can download it from http://www-db.stanford.edu/pub/papers/google.pdf in PDF format. The document describes the Page Rank technology – method of appraisal of page important, measured proceeding from pages linking to the appreciated page.

So, the Page Rank formula. It looks complicated, but it just looks so. In practice, you will need just a little knowledge of algebra (I don’t know whether algebra is studied in such volumes in schools of Her Majesty’s Land and US, but in my country math is studied since 7 y.o; algerbra and senior math since 10 y.o.)

For instance, there are page A, which has inbound links from other pages. Let’s call them T1, T2, T3, and so on up to Tn.
No math yet, we’ll just give names to things that we are going to speak about. Imagine that A is your homepage and T1-Tn – other pages, which contain hyperlinks pointing your page. For instance, T2 can be a homepage of your cousin Kate (if this helps in understanding ;) )
PageRank of page A is calculated using the following formula:

PR(A) = (1-d)+d [PR(T1)/C(T1)+PR(T2)/C(T2)+PR(T3)/C(T3)+…+PR(Tn)/C(Tn)]
In case if it looks complicated for you, let’s divide it in three groups:
PR (A) means PageRank of a page A – value we are trying to calculate. This expression just defines the problem – all calculations will be on the other side of “=”.
( 1-d) + d – fade ratio. Don’t pay attention to it. Page and Brin recommend to measure it equally to 0,85. so we will set it 0,85 and forget about it. Though it is important if you create a search engine, our calculations allow taking ready value. We are just going to calculate expression in brackets, multiply it by 0,85 and add 0,15 to the result, as it is mentioned in formula.

Now let’s get back to the expression in brackets and write it as follows:
[ PR(T1)/C(T1)+
PR(T2)/C(T2)+
PR(T3)/C(T3)+…+
PR(Tn)/C(Tn)]
It’s easy to see that T1, T2 and T3 are that pages, which link to A. I hope it’s easy to make calculations with these simple formulas you have received after dividing. Obvious difficulty is just in quantity of calculations.
PR means Page Rank of T1, T2… Tn pages. The only novelty that appears in this formula is C – quantity of hyperlinks on the given page. C(T2) is common quantity of outbound links on T2 page, e.g. links of such kind:
http://www.av.com
This link is an inbound link for page, where it points.
Having united these three components, which we have previously divided, we can define sequence of actions applying this formula to any particular page.
Create a list of all pages, which link to this page.
Define the following values for each page:
PageRank, outbound links,
Divide PageRank by outbound links (e.g. if PageRank is 6 and there are three outbound links the result will be 6:3=2. )
Make sum of such results for each inbound link.
Apply fade ratio to the result.

Link Popularity, Relevancy and Link Text

I want to discuss relationship of Link Popularity, relevancy and text links. As you surely know, link popularity is counted exactly by number of links pointing certain page, but these are just basics. Method of building certain value of Link Popularity that I have already described was working on Google few years ago, but it had changed and that is the point of interest - what changes occur and how can we improve our link popularity strategies?

Certainly, when relevancy became one of the most important criteria of appreciation of each page, it has also affected Link Popularity calculation. Due to my little investigation, a page that has ten inbound links with same keyword in link text will have better link popularity than a page that has the same ten inbound links, but with different keywords inside this link.

However, there is some limit of quantity of same inbound links, and you risk to get your site filtered or banned for spamming if you cross this limit. I tried to guess what can I do in this situation and the only thought I had is to put synonims and associated words after each thenth ibound link to my sites. For instance if I’d had a site about gourmet food, I’d put 10 links with “gourmet”, ten links with “delicious” and ten links with “tasty” keywords. This will dilute keyword density, but prevent my site from loosing link popularity, because Google knows that
these keywords are synonyms.

The other way I think about is that Google considers two phrases to be same when they are identical by symbols. If you add some extra words like adding “gourmet food” to “gourmet” - you will lose relevancy of your general keyword “gourmet”, but popularity is lost because of dilusion by something meanful and I thought what will happen if I add something senseless to my keyword? For instance if I add “+” to “gourmet”, then “gourmet +” will be different to “gourmet”, but at the same time it won’t gain any additional meaning. I consider the same tactic, when choosing domain names. Google likes, when domain is corresponding site title and most frequent keywords on site, but the majority of good domains are already taken. At the same time if you buy a domain that contains extra words, it is loosing relevancy. That is why I oftenly buy domains like “gourmet1″ or “gourmet-1″ that are containing my general keyword and a meaningless symbol that won’t affect relevancy and popularity.

These are techniques I use, but I’m sure you have much interesting to tell too. Waiting for your opinions.

Protected: Other Top100-like resoures?

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


Search Engines Algorithms: Link Popularity Analysis

It’s not a secret that good links increase traffic. But just few of webmasters I know understand that it is already not enough to have just good inbound links for good ranking of a project in search engines. The time has come, when it is necessary to pay attention to common link strategy for each site. The matter of all this changes is Google and other search engines that are trying to keep their SERPs (Search Engine Result Page(s)) clean and quality. Quality search results mean that search results will be in accordance with search query. This subject was discussed on Search Engines Strategy Conference by Teoma/AskJeeves vice-director Paul Gardi, development manager of Fast Software/Alltheweb Ralph Michelson and technology director of Google Craig Silverstein, which have discussed measuring of relevancy of the site in general and links in particular.
Top managers have recommended “good company” for better ranking of our sites. All mentioned search engines are measuring “reputation” of sites you are linked with. Craig Silverstein said that they would like to use more “human” approach in work of algorithm to appraise site value according to used keywords or key phrases. Craig said that they have recently started developing and testing complicated mathematic models and programming solutions to define value of certain website from the point of view of other surfers.
It is important to note that Google is already appraising quantity of inbound and outbound links on and to your site, their “popularity” and defines whether your project is in some “web resources community”, united with same subject in world or local scale. “The more you simplify our job, the more we like you”, Craig said. So, recommendations are rather easy – exchange links with “respectable” websites, make sure that your link partners are using keywords related to your site’s subject, be consistent using keywords on all pages of your site and very attentive writing descriptions around your keywords and links.
Undoubtedly, algorithm of links appraisal is not the one and only criteria to appreciate your site. There are many other aspects, which are taken into account by algorithm.
Theoma/AskJeeves – Paul Gardi says that “We start with text analysis, appraise it and appraise common popularity of a site by comparing and ranking sites according to the quantity of inbound links. But due to spammers activity they appreciate not just quantity, but quality of links. This means that sites having large amount of inbound links from quality resources are given priority over sites having a lot of poor links. The more quality links you have – the more your site’s priority is. At last search engine confers you high rank.
In order to form Thematic Communities we add appraisal of click popularity to appraisal of direct hit. This means that Teoma/AskJeeves appraises the whole community of sites united by common subject. Presence of “respectable” sites in such community is very important for the community in general. “We always keep eye on which resources are chosen by Thematic Community to be “experts”.
Paul says that for good Teoma/AskJeeves ranking it is necessary to optimize all pages, don’t get in a “bad company” and be sure that links descriptions are telling about something really important.
Ralph Michelson from Fast Software/Alltheweb said that their algorithm separately appraises inbound and outbound links, tendency and consistency of site’s subject. The next step is ranking and classification of links description content. As a result algorithm forms static structure that can probably accurately appraise your internet project.